<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They’re ‘killing’ Princess Di again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.froodee.com/in-the-news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.froodee.com/in-the-news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/</link>
	<description>Living.Blogging</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nikki!</title>
		<link>http://www.froodee.com/in-the-news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikki!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froodee.com/news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/#comment-129</guid>
		<description>Not quite a good deal, I think:  They just might like it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite a good deal, I think:  They just might like it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.froodee.com/in-the-news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 03:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froodee.com/news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Well, since the bosses are the ones who make the decision, the deal on the full-blown media coverage of their possible "tragic demise" should be exclusive only to them.
The camera crew need not be involved since they're just following orders. But if some of them are jumping up and down with delight at the decision of their bosses, yes, they should be included in the deal as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since the bosses are the ones who make the decision, the deal on the full-blown media coverage of their possible &#8220;tragic demise&#8221; should be exclusive only to them.<br />
The camera crew need not be involved since they&#8217;re just following orders. But if some of them are jumping up and down with delight at the decision of their bosses, yes, they should be included in the deal as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hannahgrace</title>
		<link>http://www.froodee.com/in-the-news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>hannahgrace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 18:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.froodee.com/news/they%e2%80%99re-%e2%80%98killing%e2%80%99-princess-di-again/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Things like these make me negative towards the media. I mean, why would they hide behind the guise of "public interest". Come on "interest" is the right word because people just want to gawk and it is to the channel's "self-interest" to make money out of it. It isn't as if showing the video will save anyone's life nor is it a matter of national security. SO why the heck should it be released for public interest? I admit that I have a fascination with Princess Di and am curious about the clip but give her family a break. They're human too and need some privacy. 

I think Jay that it shouldn't only be the bosses who are to be included in the deal but also the broadcaster his camera crew and all directly related to the production of that segment. What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things like these make me negative towards the media. I mean, why would they hide behind the guise of &#8220;public interest&#8221;. Come on &#8220;interest&#8221; is the right word because people just want to gawk and it is to the channel&#8217;s &#8220;self-interest&#8221; to make money out of it. It isn&#8217;t as if showing the video will save anyone&#8217;s life nor is it a matter of national security. SO why the heck should it be released for public interest? I admit that I have a fascination with Princess Di and am curious about the clip but give her family a break. They&#8217;re human too and need some privacy. </p>
<p>I think Jay that it shouldn&#8217;t only be the bosses who are to be included in the deal but also the broadcaster his camera crew and all directly related to the production of that segment. What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
